Is it the intent of exception 1.1 to classify
steel stud construction with drywall affixed
directly to both sides of the studs as
communicating stud cavities when the studs have a
small gap at the top or bottom or are punched for
the running of electrical systems?
Interpretation #7356
Published July 08, 2014
Original Request
- Code Version
- 2010
- Code
- BUILDING
- Code Description
- Building
- Chapter
- 7
- Section
- 713.3.2
- Topic
- Fire Resistance of steel studs
Question
Answer Published 07/08/2014 at 9:08 AM
No.
Commentary
The typical gap at the top and bottom of steel studs or the
small holes punched to allow electrical or other systems to
be run through the wall does not create a "communicating
cavity". However, the local authority needs to look at the
wall while at least one side is open to make certain these
gaps and holes are typical and not excessive.
Manufacturer's installation instructions typically specify
a specific sized gap at the top of the stud in fire rated
partitions. (e.g. 22mm) Presumably this is to allow
expansion when attacked by fire. However, these materials
are subject to cutting in the field and should be inspected
to verify compliance with the manufacturer's instructions
While the ICC interpretation specifically states the gaps
and openings do not constitute communicating cavities, it
is telling that neither the UL code change proposal nor the
UL engineers mention such gaps and openings.
Further information: Manufacturer's Installations may
specify a deflection gap at the top of the stud.
Information such as this appears on a detail from the USG
Steel Stud Installation Details:
Top Gaps
10 mm standard
15 mm fire rated to 3.6m
22 mm fire rated 3.61-5.4 mm