Interpretation #6876
Published December 13, 2011
Original Request
- Code Version
- 2007
- Code
- BUILDING
- Code Description
- Building
- Chapter
- 19
- Section
- 1917
- Topic
- Roofing
Question
Is it the intent of Section 1917.4.8. for a direct-adhered roofing system on lightweight insulating concrete decks, that the deck surface shall be prepared to the requirements set forth in the roof system product approval, if the Product Approval states for fully bonded assemblies no rational analysis is permitted, then absent of a tested assembly, a non-tested lightweight insulating concrete and direct adhered roofing system cannot be permitted.
Answer Published 12/13/2011 at 2:33 PM
Yes.
Commentary
Approval of materials is the responsibility of the Building
Official as provided in Section 104.9. It has been noted
that this responsibility is first technical and then
administrative. The technical aspect is a determination
that the material or installation meets the intent of the
building code. This is generally accomplished using product
approvals, engineering analysis/reports or test data from
recognized entities.
In the case of a mechanically attached roof system, an
additional number of fasteners may be calculated for the
elevated pressure zones of the perimeters and corners. This
is accomplished by increasing the number of fasteners in
those areas or decreasing the row spacing between
fasteners or a combination of both.
However, with a fully adhered roof system, the system has
been tested to its maximum resistance. Should the site
uplift pressures exceed the limits to which the fully
adhered system was tested, adding more adhesive to achieve
greater uplift resistance is not an option.
Florida statute requires roof systems to obtain a product
approval. A product approval is based on testing which
documents and verifies system performance. Should a product
approved system be insufficient to meet the site
conditions, the Building Official could reasonably require
the substitution of a roof system which meets the roof
uplift pressures.
In the HVHZ verification of a proposed roof system
accomplished through "in situ" testing in accordance with
Testing Application Standard 124 would be an optional
method to verify performance. In this way, field testing
of the roof system in actual conditions may be utilized to
show compliance.