Is it the intent of FBC Mechanical Chapter 6 to
prohibit painting exposed nonmetallic (rigid
fiberglass) ducts?
Interpretation #6603
Published August 29, 2010
Original Request
- Code Version
- 2007
- Code
- MECHANIC
- Code Description
- Chapter
- 6
- Section
- 603.4
- Topic
Question
Answer Published 08/29/2010 at 12:10 PM
The short answer to the question is maybe. If approved by
the manufacturer, or the building official as alternate
methods and materials with proper documentation.
the manufacturer, or the building official as alternate
methods and materials with proper documentation.
Commentary
While we have all seen ductwork that has paint on it,
whether intentionally or accidentally, it does not mean
that the Building Code allows it. The code is written to
protect life and property. As such, the black and white of
ink on paper may not always translate easily to the gray
world in which we live. If a tested and labeled product is
not used in accordance with that specific testing and
listing, it cannot be approved without additional
documentation. In many cases, owners and others do not
understand the ramification of making changes to products
that have been properly designed, installed and inspected.
This may lead to required changes when the modifications
are discovered. For example, once listed using a specific
test, when asked for a letter addressing this issue, the
testing lab issued a letter stating the board can not be
painted because it was not tested with the paint. There
could be other problems which are created when the board is
painted that we are not aware of. Even if the paint meets
the flame and smoke requirements, it may void the listing,
or warranty. Where duct is to be painted, installion of
exposed metal duct may be an answer in the conditioned
space. If it's exposed to the conditioned space, no
insulation is required and the cost impact may be minimal.