Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Register

Log in

Interpretations Request Input

Original Request

  • Request ID: 8555
  • Requested By: carl mike nixon
  • Requester E-Mail: mnixon@alachuacounty.us
  • Code Version: 2021
  • Code: RESIDENT
  • Code Description:
  • Chapter:
  • Section: R1506.3
  • Topic: exhaust openings
  • Question: Does the Code allow a bathroom exhaust to terminate at the interior side of and exhaust through a vented soffit?
  • Comment: None

Existing Interpretations and/or Declaratory Statements Related to this request

Input Received:

No, M1501.1 clearly does not allow discharge to the soffit
"The air removed by every mechanical exhaust system shall be discharged to the outdoors in accordance with Section M1506.3. Air shall not be exhausted into an attic, soffit, ridge vent or crawl space."
I agree with Mr. Grimm. Additionally, M1506.3 states that openings shall comply with Sections R303.5.2 and R303.6. The exhaust opening sizes found in R303.6 would not be provided by vented soffit, and therefore must be vented to required grill or louver. Additionally, R303.6 requires the termination to be outdoors, which would be in opposition to terminating the opening within the soffit confinement.
My opinion is that the person asking the question believes a bathroom exhaust grill through a vented soffit meets the intent of "exhaust directly to the outdoors", I do not. I believe the intent of the code in 1501.1 "to avoid exhausting contaminants into... concealed spaces as attics...where moisture can damage the buildings components." would not allow a bathroom exhaust vent to terminate through a vented soffit because it could not avoid exhausting contaminants into attic through soffit vents adjacent to bathroom exhaust termination grill.

Answer:

No, M1501.1 clearly does not allow discharge to the soffit

Commentary:

Additionally, M1506.3 states that openings shall comply with Sections R303.5.2 and R303.6. The exhaust opening sizes found in R303.6 would not be provided by vented soffit, and therefore must be vented to the required grill or louver. Additionally, R303.6 requires the termination to be outdoors, which would be in opposition to terminating the opening within the soffit confinement.

Comments on Draft:

Doug, I agree with your "venting" the thought, but this seems like a place for a code revision, rather than changing an existing practice due to the intent of the code.
I agree with the answer as drafted. I believe the intent of the code is to avoid adding moisture into concealed spaces such as attics, including moisture from bathroom exhaust. If the level of protection provided is not sufficient, maybe a code revision is needed to strengthen the level of protection. I believe going the other direction would weaken the level of protection.
I agree with the answer as drafted.
Agreed as drafted.
agree as drafted. otherwise it could be dangerous.
Concur with response and comments made