Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Register

Log in

Interpretations Request Input

Original Request

  • Request ID: 8536
  • Requested By: Steve Innes
  • Requester E-Mail: steve.innes@mlbfl.org
  • Code Version: 2021
  • Code: EXTBLDG
  • Code Description:
  • Chapter:
  • Section: 702.5
  • Topic: FBC Existing Buildings 702.5 and 505.3 Replacement window emergency escape and rescue openings.
  • Question: Is it the intent of section 702.5(1) and 505.3(1) Replacement window emergency escape and rescue openings; to be interpreted as “ The replacement window shall be permitted to be the same operating style as the existing window” and stop there; or; does “provides for an equal or greater window opening area that the existing window” apply to both the “same operating style” (single hung for single hung, slider for slider) and “a style” (impact vs non-impact)?
  • Comment: There appears to be two interpretations of 702.5(1) and 505.3(1) where “provides for an equal or greater window opening area than the existing opening” applies to the part after the word “or”, which would allow the same operating style replacement window to lessen the opening area. Second way to interpret is that “provides for equal or greater window opening are that the existing opening” applies to both parts of the sentence thus not allowing the same operating style replacement window to decrease opening area.

Existing Interpretations and/or Declaratory Statements Related to this request

Input Received:

The first interpretation, if you use the same style window the opening area could be reduced if that is the largest size window that will fit in the rough opening. If a different style window is to be used it must provide an opening size equal or greater than what was existing
In Chapter 3, the code gives a person 3 options of compliance - Prescriptive (chapter 5), Work Area (chapters 6-13) and Performance (chapter 14). Do NOT mix the different criteria found in these areas. Chapter 5 is different then what you find in chapter 7. That is why it's important to know from the owner, what means/method they are trying to comply with.

Saying that - I agree with the basis of Michaels comment.
I agree with those above.

Answer:

If you use the same style window the opening area could be reduced if that is the largest size window that will fit in the rough opening. If a different style window is to be used it must provide an opening size equal or greater than what was existing

Commentary:

In Chapter 3, the code gives a person 3 options of compliance - Prescriptive (chapter 5), Work Area (chapters 6-13) and Performance (chapter 14). Do NOT mix the different criteria found in these areas. Chapter 5 is different than what you find in chapter 7. That is why it's important to know from the owner, what means/method they are trying to comply with.

Comments on Draft:

agree
Agree.
Agree